From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E982C40.4040704@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:34:08 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E981906.6020400@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4E981906.6020400@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] [PULL] 2.6.38-noarch: Re-add root preemption notifier List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: adeos-main , Philippe Gerum On 10/14/2011 01:12 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > The following changes since commit 641d8e87531c6367a6357335378194ea06a23701: > > ipipe: Prevent unwritable pages after mprotect (2011-07-21 09:51:56 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe queues/2.6.38-noarch > > Jan Kiszka (1): > ipipe: Re-add root preemption notifier > > include/linux/ipipe.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/ipipe_base.h | 2 +- > kernel/ipipe/core.c | 6 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > --- > > ipipe: Re-add root preemption notifier > > Restore the original root preemption notifiers, once added for 2.6.35 > but then lost again on 2.6.36 merge. Unfortunately, the feature flag was > not lost. So it became meaningless and we have to rename it to > __IPIPE_FEATURE_ROOTPREEMPT_NOTIFIER. The I-pipe defines a generic infrastructure for events, why bypassing it? -- Gilles.