Re: [Qemu-devel] [v7 Patch 5/5]Qemu: New struct 'BDRVReopenState' for image files reopen

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 14.10.2011 15:42, schrieb Supriya Kannery:
>>> +    /* Use driver specific reopen() if available */
>>> +    if (drv->bdrv_reopen_prepare) {
>>> +        ret = drv->bdrv_reopen_prepare(bs,&rs, bdrv_flags);
>>>           if (ret<  0) {
>>> -            /* Reopen failed with orig and modified flags */
>>> -            abort();
>>> +            goto fail;
>>>           }
>>> -    }
>>> +        if (drv->bdrv_reopen_commit) {
>>> +            ret = drv->bdrv_reopen_commit(rs);
>>> +            if (ret<  0) {
>>> +                goto fail;
>>> +            }
>>> +            return 0;
>>> +        }
>>
>> Pull the return 0; out one level. It would be really strange if we
>> turned a successful prepare into reopen_abort just because the driver
>> doesn't need a commit function.
>>
>> (The other consistent way would be to require that if a driver
>> implements one reopen function, it has to implement all three of them.
>> I'm fine either way.)
>>
> 
> Will give flexibility to drivers, not mandating all the three functions.

Do we have a use case where it is actually possible to implement less
functions without introducing bugs?

If yes, let's keep it as it is.

> Got a question..
>     In raw-posix, the three functions are implemented for file_reopen 
> for now. Should this be extended to hdev, cdrom and floppy?

Yes, that would be good. And I think the same implementation can be used
for all of them.

Kevin