From: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch-fe.de>
To: openembedded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Dirk Nilius <nilius@dresearch-fe.de>
Subject: postinst problem: module vs. update-rc.d
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:00:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E984064.3010306@dresearch-fe.de> (raw)
We have a problem with a package that needs to install a kernel module and an initscript.
The recipe contains
inherit module update-rc.d
The generated postinst script is
#!/bin/sh
if [ -n "$D" ]; then
exit 1
else
depmod -a 2.6.24.7
update-modules || true
fi
if test "x$D" != "x"; then
OPT="-r $D"
else
OPT="-s"
fi
update-rc.d $OPT somescript start 90 S . stop 10 0 1 6 .
The 'exit 1' leads to an error if $D contains a nonzero length string (what is the case in the OE image creation step at the build host) and suppresses the execution of the second (update-rc.d) part.
Because of this error the postinst is run a second time when the target device boots the first time ("opkg-cl configure" from /etc/rcS.d/S40configure).
The problem is that the update-rc.d execution (and therefor the creation of the new symlink into rcS.d) is done from within rcS itself. So the rcS.d/S90somescript will *not* be executed at this boot. :(
We see two possible solutions.
A) Don't use "inherit module update-rc.d" but write the pkg_postint ourselfs.
B) Create two packages (one for the module, one for the initscript) with a runtime dependency.
I don't like both of them. Any other ideas? Is it possible to force the order of postinst fragments (update-rc.d code before module code)?
Regards,
Steffen
--
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@dresearch-fe.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 14:00 Steffen Sledz [this message]
2011-10-14 14:04 ` postinst problem: module vs. update-rc.d Phil Blundell
2011-10-14 14:08 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E984064.3010306@dresearch-fe.de \
--to=sledz@dresearch-fe.de \
--cc=nilius@dresearch-fe.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.