All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fio 2.0 coming (was "Re: Recent changes")
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:08:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9993CE.7070609@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9991B7.4050408@kernel.dk>

On 2011-10-15 15:59, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-10-15 14:55, Bruce Cran wrote:
>>
>> On 15 Oct 2011, at 13:44, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>> Please try current -git, it should work now.
>>
>> Thanks, it's fixed.
>>
>> I can crash the client by pressing ctrl-c on the server:
>>
>>> ./fio -S
>> fio: server listening on 0.0.0.0:8765
>>  and ^C> 
>> ^^^^ there seems to be a random "and" printed?
>>
>>> ./fio -C localhost examples/tiobench-example
>>
>> ...
>>
>> <muon> f3: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f3: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f3: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f4: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f4: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f4: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> f4: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 512MB)
>> <muon> 
>> Assertion failed: (cmdret->opcode == cmd.opcode), function fio_net_recv_cmd, file server.c, line 187.
>>
>> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>> [Switching to Thread 28301140 (LWP 100220/initial thread)]
>> 0x281e7207 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x281e7207 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>> #1  0x280eb377 in raise () from /lib/libthr.so.3
>> #2  0x281e5d3a in abort () from /lib/libc.so.7
>> #3  0x281ce0c6 in __assert () from /lib/libc.so.7
>> #4  0x08074f8e in fio_net_recv_cmd (sk=3) at server.c:187
>> #5  0x08077f95 in fio_handle_clients () at client.c:779
>> #6  0x08051033 in exec_run () at fio.c:1779
>> #7  0x08051be1 in main (argc=4, argv=0xbfbfec04, envp=Error accessing memory address 0xb: Bad address.
>> ) at fio.c:1904
>> (gdb) 
> 
> OK, I'll take a look at that one. You are a good tester :-)
> 
> The assert itself is a fragmented packet, where a later fragment does
> not match the initial opcode. Must be due to a read error not being
> handled correctly.

Added attempt at failing naturally when that happens, does it reproduce
now?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-15 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-14  4:00 Recent changes Jens Axboe
2011-10-14  6:20 ` Fio 2.0 coming (was "Re: Recent changes") Jens Axboe
2011-10-14 16:55   ` Bruce Cran
2011-10-15  8:08     ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-15  8:22       ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-15 12:44         ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-15 12:55           ` Bruce Cran
2011-10-15 13:59             ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-15 14:08               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-10-15 14:11                 ` Bruce Cran
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-14 16:43 Martin Steigerwald
2011-10-15  8:07 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9993CE.7070609@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bruce@cran.org.uk \
    --cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.