From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: nfs3 30% faster than nfs4?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9BDF01.6090106@aixigo.de> (raw)
Hi folks,
I did a brief test on a local nfs server: Extracting the
linux kernel sources on a nfs partition it seems that nfs3
is 30% faster than nfs4. For nfs3 I got 5.2MB/sec. Nfs4
gave me just 3.8MB/sec. The server was idle except for this
test.
Client and server were running 2.6.39 from the Debian backports
repository. I just changed the mount option on the client to
select nfs3 or nfs4.
I don't want to complain, but I did not expect this huge loss
in performance for moving to nfs4. Any helpful comment would be
highly appreciated.
Harri
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 7:53 Harald Dunkel [this message]
2011-10-17 13:39 ` nfs3 30% faster than nfs4? J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9BDF01.6090106@aixigo.de \
--to=harald.dunkel@aixigo.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.