From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFkcf-0008TU-GH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFkcZ-0002Ws-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFkcZ-0002We-J9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:39 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HAecRC021126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4E9C06E0.5000600@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:43:44 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1318847534-14357-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1318847534-14357-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] coroutinization of flush and discard (split out of NBD series) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 17.10.2011 12:32, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > This series, applying on top of block branch, enables drivers to use > coroutines for flush and discard. I kept aio_discard after discussing > with Kevin since it should be useful not only for raw-posix-aio, but also > for the userspace iSCSI backend (and in general for backends relying on > an external library that is designed around aio). > > BTW, with this patch we get "for free" the invariant that bdrv_aio_* > never returns a NULL acb (Stefan's patches already got to that point > for read/write, of course). Cool, I wasn't aware of that. That's a very nice side effect! Maybe we should write this down in a comment and remove the now unnecessary error handling from callers. Kevin