All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wu <wudxw@vnet.linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [V2 PATCH] rtl8139: check the buffer availiability
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:09:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9D5066.7070305@vnet.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111017025557.4572.2621.stgit@dhcp-8-146.nay.redhat.com>

Hi Jason,
Could you please elaborate what problem you try to resolve by this 
patch?  And do you think we need notify I/O thread re-polling tap fd 
when receive descriptor becomes available? Otherwise, tap read polling 
will be disabled until the I/O handlers are updated by other reasons. Am 
I right?


On 10/17/2011 10:55 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Reduce spurious packet drops on RX ring empty when in c+ mode by verifying that
> we have at least 1 buffer ahead of the time.
>
> Change from v1:
> Fix style comments from Stefan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
>   hw/rtl8139.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/rtl8139.c b/hw/rtl8139.c
> index 3753950..bcbc5e3 100644
> --- a/hw/rtl8139.c
> +++ b/hw/rtl8139.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,19 @@
>   #define VLAN_TCI_LEN 2
>   #define VLAN_HLEN (ETHER_TYPE_LEN + VLAN_TCI_LEN)
>
> +/* w0 ownership flag */
> +#define CP_RX_OWN (1<<31)
> +/* w0 end of ring flag */
> +#define CP_RX_EOR (1<<30)
> +/* w0 bits 0...12 : buffer size */
> +#define CP_RX_BUFFER_SIZE_MASK ((1<<13) - 1)
> +/* w1 tag available flag */
> +#define CP_RX_TAVA (1<<16)
> +/* w1 bits 0...15 : VLAN tag */
> +#define CP_RX_VLAN_TAG_MASK ((1<<16) - 1)
> +/* w2 low  32bit of Rx buffer ptr */
> +/* w3 high 32bit of Rx buffer ptr */
> +
>   #if defined (DEBUG_RTL8139)
>   #  define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
>       do { fprintf(stderr, "RTL8139: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
> @@ -805,6 +818,22 @@ static inline target_phys_addr_t rtl8139_addr64(uint32_t low, uint32_t high)
>   #endif
>   }
>
> +/* Verify that we have at least one available rx buffer */
> +static int rtl8139_cp_has_rxbuf(RTL8139State *s)
> +{
> +    uint32_t val, rxdw0;
> +    target_phys_addr_t cplus_rx_ring_desc = rtl8139_addr64(s->RxRingAddrLO,
> +                                                           s->RxRingAddrHI);
> +    cplus_rx_ring_desc += 16 * s->currCPlusRxDesc;
> +    cpu_physical_memory_read(cplus_rx_ring_desc,&val, 4);
> +    rxdw0 = le32_to_cpu(val);
> +    if (rxdw0&  CP_RX_OWN) {
> +        return 1;
> +    } else {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>   static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClientState *nc)
>   {
>       RTL8139State *s = DO_UPCAST(NICState, nc, nc)->opaque;
> @@ -819,7 +848,7 @@ static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClientState *nc)
>       if (rtl8139_cp_receiver_enabled(s)) {
>           /* ??? Flow control not implemented in c+ mode.
>              This is a hack to work around slirp deficiencies anyway.  */
> -        return 1;
> +        return rtl8139_cp_has_rxbuf(s);
>       } else {
>           avail = MOD2(s->RxBufferSize + s->RxBufPtr - s->RxBufAddr,
>                        s->RxBufferSize);
> @@ -965,19 +994,6 @@ static ssize_t rtl8139_do_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_
>
>           /* begin C+ receiver mode */
>
> -/* w0 ownership flag */
> -#define CP_RX_OWN (1<<31)
> -/* w0 end of ring flag */
> -#define CP_RX_EOR (1<<30)
> -/* w0 bits 0...12 : buffer size */
> -#define CP_RX_BUFFER_SIZE_MASK ((1<<13) - 1)
> -/* w1 tag available flag */
> -#define CP_RX_TAVA (1<<16)
> -/* w1 bits 0...15 : VLAN tag */
> -#define CP_RX_VLAN_TAG_MASK ((1<<16) - 1)
> -/* w2 low  32bit of Rx buffer ptr */
> -/* w3 high 32bit of Rx buffer ptr */
> -
>           int descriptor = s->currCPlusRxDesc;
>           target_phys_addr_t cplus_rx_ring_desc;
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-18 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-17  2:55 [Qemu-devel] [V2 PATCH] rtl8139: check the buffer availiability Jason Wang
2011-10-18 10:09 ` Mark Wu [this message]
2011-10-22  4:18   ` Jason Wang
2011-10-19  1:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-22  4:30   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9D5066.7070305@vnet.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=wudxw@vnet.linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.