From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf_samuelsson@telia.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Building multiple u-boot binaries in oe-core?
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:56:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9D6966.2040903@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j7jd54$gnc$1@dough.gmane.org>
2011-10-18 10:25, Koen Kooi skrev:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 18-10-11 10:13, Ulf Samuelsson schreef:
>> I added the functionality for building multiple u-boot binaries to
>> classic openembedded, but this has not been implemented in oe-core. I
>> find that rather useful. Anyone disagreeing?
>>
>> The core of this is:
do_compile ()
{
if ! [ "x${UBOOT_MACHINES}" == "x" ] ; then
for board in ${UBOOT_MACHINES} ; do
if ! [ `grep ${board}_config Makefile | wc -c` == 0 ] ; then
mkdir -p binaries/${board}
oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} distclean
oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} ${board}_config
oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} all
fi
done
else
oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}
oe_runmake all
fi
}
| Note that I removed the _config part from UBOOT_MACHINES.
|
| At the moment, the binary after youv'e done "make beagleboard_config;
| make" will be called: u-boot-beagleboard_config-${PV}-${PR}.bin
| I think "u-boot-beagleboard-${PV}-${PR}.bin" is nicer.
| There aren't that many boards in oe-core at the moment.
> 4 qemu machine to be exact
>
>> Isn't this a good time to get rid of UBOOT_MACHINE altogher and/or
>> redefine it without the "_config"
> Not sure, there are a *lot* of BSPs out there where _config is expected to
> be there.
A simple "sed" script would fix most if not all of the machine descriptions.
Doing it the way I did it in openembedded classic, will of course
remove the need, but leaving the u-boot recipe somewhat unclean.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iD8DBQFOnTfkMkyGM64RGpERAhgKAJ934JngAAMd33iLVGrYVKYKJ7Am8ACfaxKL
> GdSJOI5qgK2eFk7OwHwD3eU=
> =62Sb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-18 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4E9C975D.60709@telia.com>
2011-10-18 8:13 ` Building multiple u-boot binaries in oe-core? Ulf Samuelsson
2011-10-18 8:25 ` Koen Kooi
2011-10-18 11:56 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2011-10-18 21:01 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9D6966.2040903@telia.com \
--to=ulf_samuelsson@telia.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.