From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
jaxboe@fusionio.com, jbottomley@parallels.com,
roland@purestorage.com,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
tj@kernel.org, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm mpath: maintain reference count for underlying devices
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:00:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9D7880.60201@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111017201514.GA21731@redhat.com>
On 10/18/11 05:15, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> FYI, this patch from Tejun should also fix the concern I had relative to
> mpath's underlying devices' request_queues:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/16/148
Oh, that's good information.
Since the following commit, a queue can be accessed
after the device being released:
commit f758eeabeb96f878c860e8f110f94ec8820822a9
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Thu Apr 21 18:19:44 2011 -0600
writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock
I.e.
__blkdev_put
disk->fops->release()
..
bdev_inode_switch_bdi()
bdi_lock_two()
[access to bdev->bd_inode->i_data.backing_dev_info]
I think Tejun's patch is reasonable.
Thanks,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-18 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-16 13:59 [PATCH v2] dm mpath: maintain reference count for underlying devices Mike Snitzer
2011-09-19 6:49 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-09-19 14:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-09-20 5:29 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-09-20 7:13 ` James Bottomley
2011-09-20 11:31 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-17 20:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-18 13:00 ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9D7880.60201@ce.jp.nec.com \
--to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.