From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay-b21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.212]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGIKc-0002fs-UE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:40:23 +0200 Received: from iph5.telenor.se (iph5.telenor.se [195.54.127.136]) by smtprelay-b21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA500EA10C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:34:32 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.57.13] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvcjALX+nU5T4zkNPGdsb2JhbAAMOJl/jwkBAQEBN4IgAQEBAQIBAQEBNTYbCxgJGgsPAhYBGxQTBgIBAYd8CLYjiBsEkWOCGpFY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,367,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="55538891" Received: from c-0d39e353.011-39-73746f12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [10.175.196.249]) ([83.227.57.13]) by iph5.telenor.se with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2011 00:34:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9DFEF8.40705@telia.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:34:32 +0200 From: Ulf Samuelsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4E9C93AB.7090705@telia.com> <4E9CA882.7080107@gmail.com> <4E9D16AD.7040403@telia.com> <1318949254.22985.146.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1318949254.22985.146.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: Performance measurement: Building openembedded-core with and without overclocking on C-i7 2600K X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:40:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2011-10-18 16:47, Phil Blundell skrev: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> My comparision between 2 similar machines indicate that >> 32 bit 11.04 with Psyco-Dist is 20% faster than 64 bit with 11.04 >> >> The machine running 64 bit 11.04 was tested with 32 bit 11.04 >> using an external disk (connected through e-SATA) and results >> were very close to the numbers for the other 32 bit machine >> >> I didn't save those numbers but I think that is good enough >> to draw the conclusion that adding JIT for 64 bit (PyPy?) will reduce build >> time significantly. > You seem to have changed two things at once there (or perhaps just made > a bit too much of a leap in your conclusion). Did you test 32-bit > without the JIT? The word indicate is not soo strong as you indicate ;-) Just saying that if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck it is probably a duck. It takes too long to reinstall for that to be an alternative for me. More data from other people could be an alternative. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson