From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] x86, RAS: Start reorganizing RAS features support
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:27 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9F0753.1010206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301F19DBDB5@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Em 19-10-2011 15:13, Luck, Tony escreveu:
>> Start relocating RAS features into a centralized location under
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/ras/. Readjust Kconfig items and makefiles
>> accordingly.
>
> Not all ras features are "cpu" orientated ... should we really be
> moving to "arch/x86/kernel/ras"?
I think that it makes sense to move MCA bits into arch/x86, but I agree
with Tony: generally speaking, RAS is not even x86 specific.
It seems to make more sense to rename drivers/edac to drivers/ras and put
the RAS menu there, even if the actual support for the AMD and Intel MCA
RAS stuff is kept inside arch/x86/...
Mauro
>
> -Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 14:50 [RFC -v2] x86 RAS: Reorganize functionality Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, mce: Enable MCA support by default Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86, RAS: Start reorganizing RAS features support Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Luck, Tony
2011-10-19 17:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2011-10-19 18:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 19:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-10-20 15:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, RAS: Move MCE decoding code into ras/ Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86, RAS: Move MCE injection " Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, MCE: Add a HW injection flag Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, RAS: Convert mce-inject module to debugfs Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86, RAS: Add function enabling direct writes to MCE MSRs Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86, RAS: Add attributes needed for HW injection Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-19 21:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 21:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, RAS: Add an injector function Borislav Petkov
2011-10-19 17:08 ` [RFC -v2] x86 RAS: Reorganize functionality Luck, Tony
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9F0753.1010206@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.