All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Performance problems with the AR9287
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:25:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9FB0DC.9090002@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABg7HFM8NFMKa_2xdw33L0LPZ6T=H4MbY21CDOAy_4GUGY6NEg@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/19/2011 03:26 PM, Mitch Davis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing to you all on behalf of the many Fedora users with AR9287
> chips.  In Fedora 15, wireless performance with the AR9287 is
> terrible.  Here's a bug about it:
>
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702722
>
> It's now on Fedora's "common bugs" list:
>
>    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F15_bugs#Poor_transfer_speeds_with_Atheros-based_wireless_chipsets
>
> I have tried compat-wireless and compat-wireless-next (see comment 15)
> and neither gives any improvement.
>
> This chip works well with the driver that was shipped in Fedora 14
> (kernel 2.6.35).
>
> Can someone help me find the problem please?  I am happy to do
> debugging and information collection, but I'll need some hand-holding.

 From reading that report, it seems users of ath5k had issues as well,
and that upgrading to the latest wireless code fixed issues.

It's not clear at all that it's always a certain chipset.

Maybe you could get lspci info from anyone reporting these problems,
as well as confirm that the problem is fixed or not by using the
latest wireless-compat code?

For what it's worth, we see fine performance on ath9k chipsets
with the 3.0 kernel, though we are using 9380 chips mostly.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-20  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-19 22:26 [ath9k-devel] Performance problems with the AR9287 Mitch Davis
2011-10-20  0:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2011-10-20  0:15   ` Adrian Chadd
2011-10-20  2:02 ` Peter Stuge
2011-10-20  2:20   ` Mitch Davis
2011-10-20  2:30     ` Peter Stuge
2011-10-20  3:52     ` Adrian Chadd
2011-10-20  5:25 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-10-20 16:04 ` Mohammed Shafi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9FB0DC.9090002@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.