From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dgate10.ts.fujitsu.com (dgate10.ts.fujitsu.com [80.70.172.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20964E006B4 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Authentication-Results: yocto-www.yoctoproject.org; dkim=pass (1536-bit key; insecure key) header.i=Rainer.Koenig@ts.fujitsu.com; x-dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) DomainKey-Signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To: CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=q63JMqsKFhgjrNjbc0JaRhuz2/4rirnRXuXlKBJGzPtdN/PFO3WXIXCy jcoE8+BauflXuyNa1cJE6Offefnq9qclWU1TBX+i/sfVuGGG1YJIPLL3r vRZHayF5mlVU0JHDSKOWDUw1n5QtL0eEraCfEohu57vbL1SkooegNmmWw qK8i+cUAS9WIR+NQR5WmlgmFMyCQjfMUtwsP55I8KVM5UX+2Zen+ZC2u3 Hwy+t3905NfXpz/kkvTnXoAqZQRQW; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ts.fujitsu.com; i=Rainer.Koenig@ts.fujitsu.com; q=dns/txt; s=s1536b; t=1319094940; x=1350630940; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XjK1o34mX73zI5mZiFy/naxmu51jTXYv+6+jurPvGOQ=; b=mpizcjTIVBxQewsj18Cxtbd7bIfqxNLTKwld/ZRziOcaimCpozft3gGj PRFNz+TBBIFS04ds2Ah9O3qqGkq5eBJmtHktQo9vTla6ap1c7nlMM0O9o ez32WkK+HVBFdKxBOu/wsoMGXGTZYGHaqRg+k2pSzHACleq84MSXEXP/J S8SIDlBjo0zBnZGhBRZoE8UgCBYBJ5a8CXJSWNpUSgo2Re4IJZdO6NaxJ UhCZrB8nf3mlehFRt33PDNqy4GMH9; X-SBRSScore: None X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,377,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="90763733" Received: from abgdgate40u.abg.fsc.net ([172.25.138.90]) by dgate10u.abg.fsc.net with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2011 09:15:37 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,377,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="122023277" Received: from abg3595c.abg.fsc.net (HELO [172.25.145.158]) ([172.25.145.158]) by abgdgate40u.abg.fsc.net with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2011 09:15:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9FCA99.5050209@ts.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:15:37 +0200 From: Rainer Koenig User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20111004 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Mills References: <4E9EC5ED.6050503@ts.fujitsu.com> <4E9EF175.1050605@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9EF175.1050605@ti.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Questions from a greenhorn about build problems X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:15:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi William, > I think your probably running a bit ahead of us. Yes, looks like. :-) Well, my goal is to be able to build a small embedded Linux distribution for ARM based SoC boards. Currently we have the Beagleboard and the TI 8148 EVM to test, but sooner or later there will be another board available. > Keep in mind that at this point meta-texasinstruments has not been > tested with the poky layer stack. It is a work in progress and is being > tested with a layer stack that includes oe-core + meta-oe + meta-angstrom. Yes. I just tried out and ran into problems, that's what makes a developers life challenging. ;-) I really don't mind about problems as long as I have hope to fix them. > It is certainly in scope for meta-ti (new name) to work w/ a stock poky > release or snapshot, were just not verified that yet. As of now our > plan includes building and testing the following layer combinations: > > oe-core + meta-ti > oe-core + meta-ti + meta-openembedded + meta-angstrom > poky + meta-ti > oe-core + meta-ti + meta-openembedded + meta-arago <= TI SDKs Looks good, even that I faild in playing around with oe-core. One thing that made me fail could be the SOCKS problem that I solved now. Maybe I give it another test run. Anyway, yocto seems to fit perfectly for my needs since its well documented and gave me some success events. > I would encourage you to subscribe to our brand spanking new meta-ti > mailing list to discuss, monitor and prod. Ok, I subscribed to that list too. > I don't think any of this explains why you are having proxy issues and > we will let the rest of the thread play out for that. I just wanted to > set your expectations. That's ok. Looks like the proxy issue is solved and my next obstacle in the way to success is called u-boot_git.bb. So far I see that this recipe fails during configure because it wants to make with a rule "ti8148_evm_config_nand" that is not available in the u-boot sources that we currently get from git.denx.de. On the other hand I have the TI EZSDK kit available and there is an u-boot version shipped that covers the TI8148 EVM board, so I guess all I have to do is to include those sources in the meta-ti layer so that u-boot will also build for my TI8148 EVM. Well, I keep on testing and trying things out. Still new to the embedded world after many years of desktop Linux. Regards Rainer -- Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rainer Koenig Project Manager Linux Clients Dept. PDG WPS R&D SW OSE Fujitsu Technology Solutions Bürgermeister-Ullrich-Str. 100 86199 Augsburg Germany Telephone: +49-821-804-3321 Telefax: +49-821-804-2131 Mail: mailto:Rainer.Koenig@ts.fujitsu.com Internet ts.fujtsu.com Company Details ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html