From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:05:19 +0100
Subject: [GIT PULL] genirq support for GIC PPIs
In-Reply-To: <20111020112724.GZ21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <4E9FF695.10604@arm.com>
	<20111020112724.GZ21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <4EA00E7F.8060007@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 20/10/11 12:27, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> The following changes since commit 5a567d78c437e3be1c512734cdfe64b4ae6b82d7:
>>   Jamie Iles (1):
>>         ARM: 7115/4: move __exception and friends to asm/exception.h
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/mzyngier/arm-platforms.git ppi-for-rmk
>>
>> Marc Zyngier (4):
>>       genirq: Add support for per-cpu dev_id interrupts
>>       genirq: percpu: allow interrupt type to be set at enable time
>>       ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling
>>       ARM: gic, local timers: use the request_percpu_irq() interface
>>
>> Thomas Gleixner (1):
>>       genirq: Fix fatfinered fixup really
> 
> I thought you said some of these were in Thomas' tree already?

The first three patches are in Thomas' tree indeed. I could drop them
from my branch, but the resulting tree would not compile anymore.

What strategy would cause the least merging pain?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...