Update: ARM Sub-Architecture Maintainers workshop at Kernel Summit 2011

[jic23@cam.ac.uk (Jonathan Cameron)]

On 10/20/11 14:35, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Nominates, but haven't responded personally:
>> (...)
>> 22) Linus Walleji
> 
> I won't be coming, sorry friends.
> 
>> Agenda proposals (Thanks to Nicolas and Olof):
>> - the pin mux subsystem from linusw (especially if it is still RFC by
>>  then)
> 
> I will be happy to attend by wire if provided the necessary details.
> pin control with mux basics is in -next and I am iterating next design
> step with Stephen Warren from nVidia.
> 
>> Still accepting more proposals.  Send me the topics you are burning to discuss.
> 
> Since I'm not coming I don't know how relevant my opinions are.
> 
> But a topic which I think is important is:
> "Subsystems! Subsystems! Subsystems!"
> (Bonus if you get Greg to shout this dancing on stage.)
> 
> We have noticed a lack of subsystems such as pin control to
> compartmentalize "stuff" currently stacking up in arch/arm/*
> drivers/misc/* and drivers/mfd/*.
> 
> The problem of how to adress this the proper way by creating
> new subsystems need to be shed some light upon, just telling
> every subarch to "go create a new subsystem, it'll just take a
> few man-years of your working hours" apparently does not always
> work.
> 
> On a related key is the need to get the stuff in drivers/staging/iio
> into drivers/ proper.
Thanks Linus.  What this needs is a few of those man hours of people ripping
the proposed patches to shreds. Lots more to follow once step one is cleaned
up :)
> 
> Just my ?0.01..
> 
> BR,
> Linus Walleij