Re: [patch] Move nodesize/leafsize/sectorsize to fs_info

[Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>]

On 10/26/2011 06:27 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:23:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:47:15PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
>>> The sizes get initialized to 4096, but after the super block is read,
>>> these are replaced by those from the SB.
>>
>> [reads sources again] right, and the initial values are not used up to
>> that point, so 4096 could be any number.
>>
>>> It was indeed meant to get rid of the possibility to have different
>>> sizes for different trees, as it just adds complexity. Chris mentioned
>>> once that he does not intend to allow different sizes between trees,
>>> thus the idea for this cleanup.
>>
>> Ok then. I'll gather it to cleanup patch queue.
>
> Thanks, I actually don't intend to allow different leaf and node sizes
> anymore either, but we might as well keep both numbers.

So that would be another good cleanup, as it is not always easy to tell
if a block is a node or a leaf. It would actually simplify things.

-Arne

>
> -chris
>