From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Campbell Subject: Re: "Benchmarks" Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:54:47 +0800 Message-ID: <4EA8D607.4060203@fnarfbargle.com> References: <4EA20E4E.8050402@fnarfbargle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On 25/10/11 01:10, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Cool! > > The thing I'd be really curious about is what the benchmarks would > look like if you were using only the SSD, no bcache. I'll see what I can do when I next fire up the staging server. > How happy are you with it? Well, it does what it says on the tin for quick and dirty benchmarks, but I really can't even contemplate it on a production machine until it is compatible with md, and preferably has dirty write mirroring. Now I have a permanent staging server, I'll keep playing with it as the code evolves though.