Re: [PATCH 2/3] [44x] Enable CONFIG_RELOCATABLE for PPC44x

[Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@in.ibm.com>]

On 10/27/11 21:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 03:43 AM, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>> On 10/27/11 00:46, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2011 02:12 PM, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
>>>> I have renamed the new type of relocation to RELOCATABLE_PPC32_PIE. The
>>>> patches
>>>> were posted yesterday. Please let me know your thoughts.
>>>
>>> I think it would make more sense to rename the existing behavior (maybe
>>> something like DYNAMIC_MEMSTART -- if there's even enough overhead to
>>> make it worth being configurable at all), since it's not fully
>>> relocatable and since 64-bit already uses RELOCATABLE to mean PIE.
>>
>> I think leaving the current behaviour as it is, and adding the PIE as an
>> additional configuration option would be safe and wouldn't disturb the
>> existing dependencies.
>
> That's how things grow to be an unmaintainable mess.  AFAICT, what
> you're doing is the same as what 64-bit does for RELOCATABLE.  If
> they're doing the same thing, they should be called the same thing.
> Whereas 64-bit and e500 are currently doing different things for
> RELOCATABLE -- so they should be called different things.

OK. Agreed. I will resend the patches with the change.

Thanks
Suzuki