From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:16:11 +0100 Subject: config ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 In-Reply-To: <1320062362.14409.58.camel@x61.thuisdomein> References: <1320062362.14409.58.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Message-ID: <4EAE9F9B.4040201@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/31/2011 12:59 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) Since the commits > 9baeb7e4 ("at91: Add ARCH_ID and basic cpu macros [...]"), > b9e379bc ("net/can: allow CAN_AT91 on AT91SAM9X5"), and > 8c3583b6 ("at91: use structure to store the current soc") > > the mainline kernel tree uses the Kconfig symbol ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 and the > preprocessor macro CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9X5. > > 1) But there's currently no Kconfig entry ARCH_AT91SAM9X5. (Neither is > there a direct definition of the macro CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9X5.) > Shouldn't a Kconfig entry for ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 be added (to > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig)? Talking for the at91_can driver (which has been done by me): The driver and Kconfig have been prepared for the upcoming 5series AT91 SOCs. Basically the same applies to the commit 9baeb7e4 ("at91: Add ARCH_ID and basic cpu macros [...]"). But the 5series hasn't bee merged yet. Nicolas and Jean-Christophe can probably tell you more. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: