From: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] distro_tracking_fields: updates for sudo, mtools, grep, and openssh
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EAEC2CE.400@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110310908.45138.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
On 10/31/2011 02:08 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 October 2011 21:37:39 Saul Wold wrote:
>>> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
>>> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
>>> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
>>> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
>>
>> These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed
>> below also.
>
> I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not being
> consistent and using the same format for all date fields in this file?
>
Maybe I am missing your comment, is that what I not suggested in my
comment above? All date formats in the distro_tracking_fields should be
in the MMM DD, YYY format.
Sau!
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 21:32 [PATCH 0/5] Recipe upgrades Scott Garman
2011-10-25 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] sudo: upgrade to 1.8.3 Scott Garman
2011-10-25 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] grep: upgrade to 2.9 Scott Garman
2011-10-25 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtools: upgrade to 4.0.17 Scott Garman
2011-10-25 21:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] openssh: upgrade to 5.9p1 Scott Garman
2011-10-25 21:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] distro_tracking_fields: updates for sudo, mtools, grep, and openssh Scott Garman
2011-10-26 20:37 ` Saul Wold
2011-10-31 9:08 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-10-31 15:46 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-10-31 16:05 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-01 11:38 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-10-27 7:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] Recipe upgrades Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EAEC2CE.400@intel.com \
--to=saul.wold@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.