From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patchset 0/8] pnfs-obj: Move to ORE for v3.2 merge window
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EAEDFA6.4080303@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319909073.2760.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On 10/29/2011 10:24 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Boaz,
>
> Have you tested these patches in linux-next? If so, I can pull them in
> from open-osd.org and send them with the next merge. If not, I think
> patches (as soon as possible!) would be better. I'll commit them to
> nfs-for-next, and we can try to get them in...
>
> Cheers
> Trond
>
Hi Trond.
These patches where in next since before the BAT when I sent them to the
list, then based on my exofs tree. I have now rebased on Linus master
based on my pull bits and Yours, and again they where in next since
Thursday. But the big question is did we have linux-next in that time
frame because I thought Stephen was on vacation and the last linux-next
was around Oct 20th?
Any way both our bits where in Linux next since Oct 16. The patches are
rebased but completely unchanged.
Is there some tests I should make, other then compile oldmodconfig x86_64
and x86_32? I wish I had setup for more compilers.
But I'd say the risk is very low since the exact patches did sit in next.
And after rebase I run a compile and a short test run.
Any way I can post the patches. Give me an hour
Boaz
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 12:13 -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Trond hi.
>>
>> Now that both your NFS bits and ORE bits are in Linus tree. We can send in
>> the pnfs-objects layout driver patches.
>>
>> How do you want to do this. Should I post them by email, or do you want
>> to pull them from git.open-osd.org?
>>
>> The patches are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
>>
>> Based on commit f362f98e7c445643d27c610bb7a86b79727b592e:
>> Merge branch 'for-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hch/vfs-queue (2011-10-28 10:49:34 -0700)
>>
>> Boaz Harrosh (8):
>> pnfs-obj: Remove redundant EOF from objlayout_io_state
>> pnfs-obj: Return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED in case of read/write_pagelist
>> pnfs-obj: Get rid of objlayout_{alloc,free}_io_state
>> pnfs-obj: Rename objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 01: ore_layout & ore_components
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 02: move to ORE
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 03: Remove old raid engine
>> pnfs-obj: Support for RAID5 read-4-write interface.
>>
>> fs/exofs/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 872 ++++++++++--------------------------------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 209 ++++-------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 48 ++--
>> 4 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 829 deletions(-)
>>
>> ---
>> List of commits:
>>
>> commit dde406e58cd91b10233c40fa5ea86c1261a4d043
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Wed Oct 12 15:42:07 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: Support for RAID5 read-4-write interface.
>>
>> The ore need suplied a r4w_get_page/r4w_put_page API
>> from Filesystem so it can get cache pages to read-into when
>> writing parial stripes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit 48a5fbeedb4b9a80930e987a8f7bea4f784ae4e0
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Mon Oct 3 16:55:29 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 03: Remove old raid engine
>>
>> Finally remove all the old raid engine, which is by now
>> dead code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 504 ------------------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 504 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit b0f3d5f82fd8acefc0f2659cf1bb931942500db5
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Mon Oct 3 20:26:05 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 02: move to ORE
>>
>> In this patch we are actually moving to the ORE.
>> (Object Raid Engine).
>>
>> objio_state holds a pointer to an ore_io_state. Once
>> we have an ore_io_state at hand we can call the ore
>> for reading/writing. We register on the done path
>> to kick off the nfs io_done mechanism.
>>
>> Again for Ease of reviewing the old code is "#if 0"
>> but is not removed so the diff command works better.
>> The old code will be removed in the next patch.
>>
>> fs/exofs/Kconfig::ORE is modified to also be auto-included
>> if PNFS_OBJLAYOUT is set. Since we now depend on ORE.
>> (See comments in fs/exofs/Kconfig)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/exofs/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit 79ca7af7ec31cbf83a86e61c80ca0e24215244bf
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Mon Oct 3 15:57:55 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: move to ore 01: ore_layout & ore_components
>>
>> For Ease of reviewing I split the move to ore into 3 parts
>> move to ore 01: ore_layout & ore_components
>> move to ore 02: move to ORE
>> move to ore 03: Remove old raid engine
>>
>> This patch modifies the objio_lseg, layout-segment level
>> and devices and components arrays to use the ORE types.
>>
>> Though it will be removed soon, also the raid engine
>> is modified to actually compile, possibly run, with
>> the new types. So it is the same old raid engine but
>> with some new ORE types.
>>
>> For Ease of reviewing, some of the old code is
>> "#if 0" but is not removed so the diff command works
>> better. The old code will be removed in the 3rd patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit 67d896c6805004e1ca32c07d9c0a4df504eb7658
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Mon Oct 3 17:21:47 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: Rename objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res
>>
>> * All instances of objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res
>> * All instances of state => oir;
>> * All instances of ol_state => oir;
>>
>> Big but nothing to it
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 17 +++++------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 15 ++++++----
>> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit daaaebf9e448ad8a306333537dfabf1e878bd47d
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Tue Aug 16 17:34:59 2011 -0700
>>
>> pnfs-obj: Get rid of objlayout_{alloc,free}_io_state
>>
>> This is part of moving objio_osd to use the ORE.
>>
>> objlayout_io_state had two functions:
>> 1. It was used in the error reporting mechanism at layout_return.
>> This function is kept intact.
>> (Later patch will rename objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res)
>> 2. Carrier of rw io members into the objio_read/write_paglist API.
>> This is removed in this patch.
>>
>> The {r,w}data received from NFS are passed directly to the
>> objio_{read,write}_paglist API. The io_engine is now allocating
>> it's own IO state as part of the read/write. The minimal
>> functionality that was part of the generic allocation is passed
>> to the io_engine.
>>
>> So part of this patch is rename of:
>> ios->ol_state.foo => ios->foo
>>
>> At objlayout_{read,write}_done an objlayout_io_state is passed that
>> denotes the result of the IO. (Hence the later name change).
>> If the IO is successful objlayout calls an objio_free_result() API
>> immediately (Which for objio_osd causes the release of the io_state).
>> If the IO ended in an error it is hanged onto until reported in
>> layout_return and is released later through the objio_free_result()
>> API. (All this is not new just renamed and cleaned)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 124 +++++++++++-------------------------------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 36 ++++++-------
>> 3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit 1f1fe6e7fee0ee5e6ffa9807a0be763f4b6b01d8
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Sun Oct 2 17:23:29 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: Return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED in case of read/write_pagelist
>>
>> objlayout driver was always returning PNFS_ATTEMPTED from it's
>> read/write_pagelist operations. Even on error. Fix that.
>>
>> Start by establishing an error return API from io-engine, by
>> not returning ssize_t (length-or-error) but returning "int"
>> 0=OK, 0>Error. And clean up all return types in io-engine.
>>
>> Then if io-engine returned error return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED
>> to generic layer. (With a dprint)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> commit 64a6725b53fad1f199e9cafa5634573b392e9b01
>> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> Date: Sun Oct 2 16:06:09 2011 +0200
>>
>> pnfs-obj: Remove redundant EOF from objlayout_io_state
>>
>> The EOF calculation was done on .read_pagelist(), cached
>> in objlayout_io_state->eof, and set in objlayout_read_done()
>> into nfs_read_data->res.eof.
>>
>> So set it directly into nfs_read_data->res.eof and avoid
>> the extra member.
>>
>> This is a slight behaviour change because before eof was
>> *not* set on an error update at objlayout_read_done(). But
>> is that a problem? Is Generic layer so sensitive that it
>> will miss the error IO if eof was set? From my testing
>> I did not see such a problem.
>>
>> Benny please review.
>>
>> Which brings me to a more abstract problem. Why does the
>> LAYOUT driver needs to do this eof calculation? .i.e we
>> are inspecting generic i_size_read() and if spanned by
>> offset + count which is received from generic layer we set
>> eof. It looks like all this can/should be done in generic
>> layer and not at LD. Where does NFS and files-LD do it?
>> It looks like it can be promoted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 16 +++++++---------
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 1 -
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> Thanks very much
>> Boaz
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 19:13 [patchset 0/8] pnfs-obj: Move to ORE for v3.2 merge window Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-29 17:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-29 17:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-31 17:49 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2011-10-31 21:34 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 21:34 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] pnfs-obj: Remove redundant EOF from objlayout_io_state Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-31 22:45 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 23:23 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 23:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-31 23:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-01 2:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-31 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/8] pnfs-obj: Return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED in case of read/write_pagelist Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] pnfs-obj: Get rid of objlayout_{alloc,free}_io_state Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] pnfs-obj: Rename objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] pnfs-obj: move to ore 01: ore_layout & ore_components Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] pnfs-obj: move to ore 02: move to ORE Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] pnfs-obj: move to ore 03: Remove old raid engine Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] pnfs-obj: Support for RAID5 read-4-write interface Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-01 17:42 ` [patchset 0/8] pnfs-obj: Move to ORE for v3.2 merge window Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-02 19:01 ` [osd-dev] " Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-02 19:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EAEDFA6.4080303@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.