From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Fietkau Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:05:32 +0100 Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9285 and Thompson TG585 v8 connection problems In-Reply-To: References: <4E8895F7.1050902@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> <4E91C0D6.4010803@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> <4E9C95A1.4020500@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> <4E9DEFA9.3040709@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> <4EA93402.9020300@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> <4EAC1C80.4040704@summers5913.freeserve.co.uk> Message-ID: <4EAF0D9C.6000806@nbd.name> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 2011-10-31 9:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 1 November 2011 00:04, Mohammed Shafi wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David Summers > >> i assume if we remove the antenna in chain0, the performance will be >> bad. as per my assumption tx will always happen in chain0.(does we >> have some tx diversity?) > > If you have an AR9285 with an antenna switch (and I don't have one, so > I can't test) then you MAY be ok. But Felix and others have removed > that TX diversity code from ath9k. > So I'm not sure whether the antenna switch based TX diversity code > would work. FreeBSD? It may work. > > But unless you're very lucky, I suggest "no" to the AR9285 + TX diversity :) > > (I'll see if I can source some more AR9285's, hopefully one will have > the antenna switch hardware attached.) As far as I know, the AR9285 chip does not have any tx diversity. - Felix