From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLK5p-0003Fd-IX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:33:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLK5o-0002eR-K6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:33:53 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate06.web.de ([217.72.192.247]:58996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLK5o-0002eL-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:33:52 -0400 Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate06.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C65DACA6D3 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:33:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EB0494A.60206@web.de> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:32:26 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1320088682-12958-1-git-send-email-andreas.faerber@web.de> <1320088682-12958-3-git-send-email-andreas.faerber@web.de> <47C91597-B6B1-4351-9DC3-30E405EC480B@sunshineco.com> <4EB0202E.50701@web.de> <20B88770-C260-4A2F-8E85-B84493675F10@sunshineco.com> <4EB03FE9.7090007@web.de> <72FFEFE7-437A-4B1E-86FE-4169B4EE50CA@sunshineco.com> <0D2342C8-61BE-4D39-A115-9F48CC682B95@sunshineco.com> In-Reply-To: <0D2342C8-61BE-4D39-A115-9F48CC682B95@sunshineco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] softfloat: Avoid uint16 type conflict on Darwin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Peter Maydell , Juan Pineda , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 01.11.2011 20:25, schrieb Eric Sunshine: > I forgot to mention that with your patch, only cocoa.m is seeing > Darwin's definition of uint16. The rest of qemu is seeing the definition > from softfloat.h. This inconsistency hopefully is not harmful in the > short-term, which is why I asked about the goal. If the short-term idea > is for cocoa.m to build cleanly but not to worry much that cocoa.m sees > a different uint16 from the rest of qemu, then the less intrusive patch > involving only cocoa.m may be preferable. Ouch. Meaning both our softfloat patches are wrong, so I'll go with (2). It's evening in Italy and the last day for submaintainer PULLs. AF