From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] nand: Merge new implementation of 1-bit ECC from Linux nand driver
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:30:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB056E8.9080101@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAFA47D.6040109@aizo.com>
On 11/01/2011 02:49 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
> Am 31.10.2011 21:15, schrieb Scott Wood:
>> On 10/31/2011 07:22 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
>>> Am 29.10.2011 00:30, schrieb Scott Wood:
>>>> On 10/12/2011 02:32 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
>>>>> [backport from linux commit 02f8c6aee8df3cdc935e9bdd4f2d020306035dbe]
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch synchronizes the nand driver with the Linux 3.0 state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adds 1416 bytes to the image size.
>>>>
>>>> What does this version of the code do that warrants the code size
>>>> increase? This could break some SPLs.
>>>>
>>>> If it's just a speed issue, we probably want to stick with the current code.
>>>
>>> It's the rewrite for performance and support for 512 byte pages, but this is
>>> on the basis of the rewritten code.
>>
>> Several SPLs make use of nand_ecc.c, so NACK replacing it with a larger
>> implementation.
>
> So, should I resubmit the patch series without this part?
Not if the current patchset works with this one dropped.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 7:31 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] nand: Merge BCH code from Linux nand driver Christian Hitz
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] nand: Add more NAND types " Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:24 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] nand: cleanup whitespace Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] nand: Merge changes from Linux nand driver Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 21:59 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] nand: Merge new implementation of 1-bit ECC " Christian Hitz
2011-10-28 22:30 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-31 12:22 ` Christian Hitz
2011-10-31 20:15 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 7:49 ` Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 20:30 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] nand: Merge changes to BBT " Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] nand: Sanitize ONFI strings Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:28 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 22:04 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 22:08 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 22:09 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] nand: Merge BCH code from Linux nand driver Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB056E8.9080101@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.