From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: Re: [RFC] hda - is_jack_detectable() Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:03:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB05EA1.1060701@canonical.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9338244D9 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:03:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Raymond Yau Cc: Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org 2011-10-24 23:31, Raymond Yau skrev: > sorry, it should be > > static inline bool is_jack_detectable(struct hda_codec *codec, hda_nid_t nid) > { > return (snd_hda_query_pin_caps(codec, nid)& AC_PINCAP_PRES_DETECT)&& > + !(get_defcfg_misc(snd_hda_codec_get_pincfg(codec, nid) > & AC_DEFCFG_MISC_NO_PRESENCE))&& > (get_wcaps(codec, nid)& AC_WCAP_UNSOL_CAP); > } > I also think it is a good idea, in fact I thought it was this way already. Can we merge this patch? // David