From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi_dh_rdac: Adding the match function for rdac device handler
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:20:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB0EF3F.1010300@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D23AD8469A2B448F33C24BD7A39BD9105DB4D8@RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
On 11/01/2011 06:19 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> This patch introduces the match function for rdac device handler. Without this,
> sometimes handler attach fails during the device_add. The match function was
> introduced by this patch
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg54284.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger<babu.moger@netapp.com>
> ---
>
> --- linux/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c.orig 2011-10-31 11:25:44.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c 2011-10-31 11:31:34.000000000 -0500
> @@ -819,6 +819,21 @@ static const struct scsi_dh_devlist rdac
> {NULL, NULL},
> };
>
> +static bool rdac_match(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; rdac_dev_list[i].vendor; i++) {
> + if (!strncmp(sdev->vendor, rdac_dev_list[i].vendor,
> + strlen(rdac_dev_list[i].vendor))&&
> + !strncmp(sdev->model, rdac_dev_list[i].model,
> + strlen(rdac_dev_list[i].model))) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int rdac_bus_attach(struct scsi_device *sdev);
> static void rdac_bus_detach(struct scsi_device *sdev);
>
> @@ -831,6 +846,7 @@ static struct scsi_device_handler rdac_d
> .attach = rdac_bus_attach,
> .detach = rdac_bus_detach,
> .activate = rdac_activate,
> + .match = rdac_match,
> };
>
> static int rdac_bus_attach(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>
As stated in the other mail, I guess we would need to have a check
if the LUN is in ALUA mode.
And, btw, the _original_ intention was to allow vendor-specific
device_handler to do some better probing, eg querying some
vendor-specific VPD pages.
Especially for RDAC it would make far more sense to query the
existence and format of one of the RDAC-specific VPD pages (eg 0xC2,
0xC4, or 0xC8) and use that for matching.
Then you could do away with the vendor/model array altogether here
and we wouldn't need to update the rdac handler every time a new
array comes out or has been rebranded by some OEM.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-01 17:19 [PATCH 3/4] scsi_dh_rdac: Adding the match function for rdac device handler Moger, Babu
2011-11-02 7:20 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2011-11-02 15:23 ` [dm-devel] " Moger, Babu
2011-11-02 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-02 15:41 ` Moger, Babu
2011-11-02 15:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-03 14:47 ` [dm-devel] " Moger, Babu
2011-11-03 15:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-16 17:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-16 22:10 ` Moger, Babu
2011-11-16 22:40 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB0EF3F.1010300@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.