From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35114)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RLaab-0003nI-BI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:10:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RLaaZ-000748-Sn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:10:45 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:48644)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RLaaZ-000744-QL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:10:43 -0400
Received: by ywb3 with SMTP id 3so125873ywb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EB1414D.8070601@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:10:37 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4EB09249.3050700@us.ibm.com>
	<CAMo8Bf+7RoWtXZX-BiHxrS+c7bE5BK5iz_dFzRP+0GEJ6tO4LA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8Bf+7RoWtXZX-BiHxrS+c7bE5BK5iz_dFzRP+0GEJ6tO4LA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We have now entered 1.0 hard freeze
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 11/02/2011 08:08 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> If you're a contributor and have a question about a patch that didn't make
>> the hard freeze, please feel free to ask about it, but at this point, it's
>> very unlikely to make it to 1.0.
>
> My pull request for the xtensa
> (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-10/msg03962.html)
> haven't got any attention.

I'm expecting Blue to pull that.  It made it in time for 1.0.  The same is true 
for TCGi.

> I can resend it, should you reconsider applying it, or I can resend
> only 'fixes'-part of it.
>
> And also I'd like it to be clarified, whether I should consider myself
> a contributor or a submaintainer.

If you do PULL requests, you're a submaintainer :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>> If you're a submaintainer, it's up to you about whether you continue taking
>> new features into your tree during the freeze.  I would strongly encourage
>> it.  But only send pull requests that contain bug fixes from this point on.
>