From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:29:41 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? In-Reply-To: References: <4EAA5AF3.9000800@hoster-ok.com> Message-ID: <4EB145C5.4080109@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/2/2011 2:23 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: > I am actually buiding everything from source (glue, RA, pcmk, > corosync/openais, dlm and friends), > hoping that way I do not have to wait for the release of fedora 17 > (May 2012). I actually need this > as soon as possible. We always welcome patches and code contribution to speed things up. Fabio > > Nick > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: >>> That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable >>> release of: >>> * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld >>> * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman >>> >>> will be availabile? >> >> Maybe fedora 17 >> >>> >>> Thanks in Advance, >>> >>> Nick. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>> Hello Gents, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>>>> plans once the next >>>>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what >>>>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >>>> >>>> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >>>> to corosync. >>>> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>>> >>>>> Nick. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>>>> active/active using: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>>>> Cluster3 >>>>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>>>> OCFS2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>>>> >>>>>> You may look at >>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html >>>>>> >>>>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>>>> >>>>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Vladislav >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >