From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Dake Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:29:17 -0700 Subject: [Cluster-devel] pcmk+corosync controld, dlm support without cman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EB19A0D.90102@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/01/2011 06:23 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: > That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable > release of: > * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld > * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman > > will be availabile? > > Thanks in Advance, > > Nick. > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis wrote: >>> Hello Gents, >>> >>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>> plans once the next >>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what >>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >> >> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >> to corosync. >> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >> >>> >>> Thanks in Advance, >>> >>> Nick. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: >>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>> active/active using: >>>>> >>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>> Cluster3 >>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>> OCFS2 >>>>> >>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>> The developer community is targeting Fedora 17 for upstream integration of this work. Fedora 17 schedule hasn't been published and won't be until F16 is finalized. (next few weeks). I expect other distros will follow on once the dust settles. Regards -steve . >>>> You may look at >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html >>>> >>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>> >>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Vladislav >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >