From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815DEE00307 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2011 09:03:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,456,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="81279396" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.15.248]) ([10.255.15.248]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2011 09:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4EB40CEC.4030106@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:03:56 -0700 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: why do numerous .bb files set "PARALLEL_MAKE"? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:04:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/11/11 08:57, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > stumbled over this so i did a more thorough search: > > $ grep -w PARALLEL_MAKE $(find . -name *.bb) > ./meta/recipes-qt/qt-apps/qmmp_0.5.1.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-core/eggdbus/eggdbus_0.6.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.16.1.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1.bb:#PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.1.7.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-extended/sat-solver/sat-solver_git.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE="" > ./meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash_3.2.48.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-extended/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ./meta/recipes-extended/groff/groff_1.20.1.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE = "" > ... more snipped ... > > why are individual recipes setting PARALLEL_MAKE to the empty > string? it's a *build* option, why would it have any relevance to > individual .bb files? Because that individual BB file has problems being run with parallel make (make -j). > > conversely, i don't see a single .bb file that sets > BB_NUMBER_THREADS. the above just looks ... odd. That's the amount of threads BitBake creates, tasks it will run in parallel. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre