From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiao.grong@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:05:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBBDA3B.9040504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBBD190.2020404@gmail.com>
On 11/10/2011 03:28 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> I have tested RHEL.6.1 setup/boot/reboot/shutdown and the complete
> output of scan_results.py is attached.
>
> The result shows the performance is improved:
> before: After:
> 570 529
> 555 538
> 552 531
> 546 528
> 553 559
> 553 527
> 550 523
> 553 533
> 547 538
> 550 526
>
> How do you think about it? :)
Well, either I was sloppy in my measurements, or maybe RHEL 6 is very
different from F9 (unlikely). I'll measure it again and see.
btw, this is with ept=0, yes?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark accessed bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instructions Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page Marcelo Tosatti
2011-09-30 3:49 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-10-05 13:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-06 17:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-10-06 17:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-10-08 4:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-10-09 12:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-09 13:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-11 8:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-04 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-06 15:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 13:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-10 14:05 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-11-11 3:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBBDA3B.9040504@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiao.grong@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.