From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: convert MCT to percpu interrupt API
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:02:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBCF2BD.8050804@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0PZbRKcnVwCGsYrMYr39O2S9rTRbX3MzXVW5nQs=MhYi_FQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/11/11 23:33, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 10/11/11 02:40, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> MCT recently gained per cpu interrupts, and missed the fact that
>>>> ARM has moved to a genirq based implementation.
>>>>
>>>> This patch converts the driver to the new API.
>>>>
>>>> Boot tested on Origen.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>
>>> There is one concern regarding the CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMER.
>>>
>>> []
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS */
>>>>
>>>> static void __init exynos4_timer_resources(void)
>>>> @@ -438,6 +442,16 @@ static void __init exynos4_timer_resources(void)
>>>> mct_clk = clk_get(NULL, "xtal");
>>>>
>>>> clk_rate = clk_get_rate(mct_clk);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_PPI) {
>>>> + int err;
>>>> +
>>>> + err = request_percpu_irq(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER,
>>>> + exynos4_mct_tick_isr, "MCT",
>>>> + &percpu_mct_tick);
>>>> + WARN(err, "MCT: can't request IRQ %d (%d)\n",
>>>> + IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER, err);
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> You've added exynos4_mct_tick_isr, which is defined in
>>> CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMER section, in the place that is compiled without
>>> CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMER.
>>> I guess we are going to stop supporting LOCAL_TIMER in Exynos later
>>> and this could be a problem with it.
>>
>> Yup, this is a problem. It probably means we need to #ifdef that chink
>> as well. I'm not sure I get your remark about not supporting LOCAL_TIMER
>> though. Are you planning to move away from the LOCAL_TIMER infrastructure?
>
> Yes, we may need to #ifdef that block.
> And yes, for the Exynos series, I'll need to double check; however, I
> think we are planning to move away from the LOCAL_TIMER for MCT.
I have patches for this already.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-02 17:30 [PATCH 0/2] PPI fixes for 3.2 Marc Zyngier
2011-11-02 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: convert MCT to percpu interrupt API Marc Zyngier
2011-11-03 6:27 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-11-10 2:40 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-11-10 9:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-11-10 23:33 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-11-11 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2011-11-02 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mcx: fix local timer interrupt handling Marc Zyngier
2011-11-02 18:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-03 4:35 ` Shawn Guo
2011-11-03 6:55 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBCF2BD.8050804@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.