All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <4EBD1F3E.2040402@freescale.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7fe5bfe..5919206 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,18 +4,16 @@ Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
 > approach it. It should clearly be fixed and hidden for real 64-bit. As
 > for the rest, should it be user selectable ?
 
-I have been unable to convince our BSP teams that the minor performance=20
-improvement of a 32-bit kernel vs 36-bit is not worth the hassle.  We ship=
-=20
-a lot of lower-end e500 systems that will never have more than 2GB of memor=
-y.
+I have been unable to convince our BSP teams that the minor performance 
+improvement of a 32-bit kernel vs 36-bit is not worth the hassle.  We ship 
+a lot of lower-end e500 systems that will never have more than 2GB of memory.
 
-The P1022DS is an example.  We ship 32-bit and 36-bit versions of U-Boot,=20
-the kernel, and the device tree.  I recently added code to U-boot to=20
-detect if you have a mismatched U-Boot and device tree, because it is so=20
-easy to mess that up.  I would like nothing more than to abandon 32-bit=20
+The P1022DS is an example.  We ship 32-bit and 36-bit versions of U-Boot, 
+the kernel, and the device tree.  I recently added code to U-boot to 
+detect if you have a mismatched U-Boot and device tree, because it is so 
+easy to mess that up.  I would like nothing more than to abandon 32-bit 
 for all e500, but I don't see Freescale allowing that any time soon.
 
---=20
+-- 
 Timur Tabi
-Linux kernel developer at Freescale=
+Linux kernel developer at Freescale
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 0708576..23a0b91 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -8,18 +8,21 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 02/17] powerpc: Split up PHYS_64BIT config option to fix \"select\" issues\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:12:31 +0000\0"
  "To\0Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>"
-  Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
-  Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-  Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
+ "Cc\0Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>"
+  Moffett
+  Kyle D <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>
+  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
+  Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
+  Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>
   Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
   Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-  Moffett
-  Kyle D <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>
+  Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
+  Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
   Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
-  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
- " Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>\0"
+  Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
+ " Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:\n"
@@ -28,20 +31,18 @@
  "> approach it. It should clearly be fixed and hidden for real 64-bit. As\n"
  "> for the rest, should it be user selectable ?\n"
  "\n"
- "I have been unable to convince our BSP teams that the minor performance=20\n"
- "improvement of a 32-bit kernel vs 36-bit is not worth the hassle.  We ship=\n"
- "=20\n"
- "a lot of lower-end e500 systems that will never have more than 2GB of memor=\n"
- "y.\n"
+ "I have been unable to convince our BSP teams that the minor performance \n"
+ "improvement of a 32-bit kernel vs 36-bit is not worth the hassle.  We ship \n"
+ "a lot of lower-end e500 systems that will never have more than 2GB of memory.\n"
  "\n"
- "The P1022DS is an example.  We ship 32-bit and 36-bit versions of U-Boot,=20\n"
- "the kernel, and the device tree.  I recently added code to U-boot to=20\n"
- "detect if you have a mismatched U-Boot and device tree, because it is so=20\n"
- "easy to mess that up.  I would like nothing more than to abandon 32-bit=20\n"
+ "The P1022DS is an example.  We ship 32-bit and 36-bit versions of U-Boot, \n"
+ "the kernel, and the device tree.  I recently added code to U-boot to \n"
+ "detect if you have a mismatched U-Boot and device tree, because it is so \n"
+ "easy to mess that up.  I would like nothing more than to abandon 32-bit \n"
  "for all e500, but I don't see Freescale allowing that any time soon.\n"
  "\n"
- "--=20\n"
+ "-- \n"
  "Timur Tabi\n"
- Linux kernel developer at Freescale=
+ Linux kernel developer at Freescale
 
-143dc6a09bb1d7ad69a4ebd8d1f8d4568ab5a1858ac6504998558c4bb00676fe
+08b9cf9a199519e72a0138695b91229407f6f631c5a41b3b1084ac722f3fcb88

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.