From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Helmut Raiger Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:06:05 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] imx: mmc: access mxcmmc from mx31 boards In-Reply-To: <4EB79F25.1000009@denx.de> References: <4EA684D5.8030608@denx.de> <1319717957-30517-1-git-send-email-helmut.raiger@hale.at> <4EB0EB13.2070404@hale.at> <4EB78FE8.5000308@hale.at> <4EB79F25.1000009@denx.de> Message-ID: <4EC0D9FD.6090705@hale.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 11/07/2011 10:04 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 11/07/2011 08:59 AM, Helmut Raiger wrote: >> On 11/02/2011 08:02 AM, Helmut Raiger wrote: >>> On 10/27/2011 02:19 PM, Helmut Raiger wrote: >>>> This patch modifies mxcmmc.c to be used >>>> not only by i.MX27 but also by i.MX31 boards. >>>> Both use the same SD controller, but have different >>>> clock set-ups. >>>> The i.MX27 imx_get_XXXclock functions are made static to >>>> generic.c and a public mxc_get_clock() function >>>> is provided. Pins, base address and prototypes for >>>> an i.MX31 specific board_init_mmc() are provided. >>>> Some of the i.MX27 clock getters are unused and marked >>>> as such to avoid warnings (./MAKEALL -s mx27), but >>>> the code was left in for future use. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Helmut Raiger >>> I just re-titled the patch to make it visible for the imx community, >>> it concerns i.MX27 and i.MX31, so mmc: is probably the wrong >>> category anyway. >>> >>> Helmut > Hi Helmut, > >> Anything amiss? >> Helmut > I have seen your message regarding your patch "tt01: add MMC and video > support" asking to ignore it, and I have ignored this patch, too.... > > I will review it soo - however, there is no use case for MMC on the > i.MX31 until you submit a patch for your board supporting MMC. > > Best regards, > Stefano Babic > Hi, Stefano I don't want to be pushing, but this sits here since 3 weeks, can I be of some help? Concerning the TT-01 extension patch, I meant it has to wait until this patch is through. So if you don't like the idea of having a patch no-one is using, simply apply both of them. For your reference: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122139/ this one http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122176/ board support extension Thanks in advance, Helmut Helmut -- Scanned by MailScanner.