From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Jason Thomas <jthomas@islinc.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: x86 versus 64 bit emulation complexity
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:43:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC1C3CE.3070105@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <007501cca31f$3e4b55e0$bae201a0$@com>
On 11/14/2011 02:46 PM, Jason Thomas wrote:
>
> This is a general question about the complexity of emulating a 32 bit
> x86 environment compared to a 64 bit environment. What are the
> differences between the two types. Does one require much more
> code/complexity to emulate compared with the other?
>
That's not really on-topic for this list, unless you have a specific
question about Xen.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 22:46 x86 versus 64 bit emulation complexity Jason Thomas
2011-11-15 1:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-11-15 2:17 ` Todd Deshane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC1C3CE.3070105@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jthomas@islinc.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.