From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <paul@paulmenage.org>,
<lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
<a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] split kernel stat in two
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:34:53 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC39FDD.10207@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC3545C.60602@google.com>
On 11/16/2011 04:12 AM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 07:59 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> In a later patch, we will use cpustat information per-task group.
>> However, some of its fields are naturally global, such as the irq
>> counters. There is no need to impose the task group overhead to them
>> in this case. So better separate them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
>> CC: Paul Tuner<pjt@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/appldata/appldata_os.c | 16 +++++++-------
>> arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 20 ++++++++--------
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 20 ++++++++--------
>> drivers/macintosh/rack-meter.c | 6 ++--
>> fs/proc/stat.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>> include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 8 ++++++-
>> kernel/sched.c | 18 ++++++++-------
>> 8 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_os.c
>> b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_os.c
>> index 3d6b672..695388a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_os.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_os.c
>> @@ -115,21 +115,21 @@ static void appldata_get_os_data(void *data)
>> j = 0;
>> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_user =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[USER]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[USER]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_nice =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[NICE]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[NICE]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_system =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SYSTEM]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[SYSTEM]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_idle =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[IDLE]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[IDLE]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_irq =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[IRQ]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[IRQ]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_softirq =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SOFTIRQ]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[SOFTIRQ]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_iowait =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[IOWAIT]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[IOWAIT]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].per_cpu_steal =
>> - cputime_to_jiffies(kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[STEAL]);
>> + cputime_to_jiffies(kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[STEAL]);
>> os_data->os_cpu[j].cpu_id = i;
>> j++;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
>> index 56fa4d7..1f1b536 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void fpu_fxsave(struct fpu *fpu)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> #define safe_address (__per_cpu_offset[0])
>> #else
>> -#define safe_address (kstat_cpu(0).cpustat[USER])
>> +#define safe_address (__get_cpu_var(kernel_cpustat).cpustat[USER])
>> #endif
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
>> index 2ab538f..a3a739f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
>> @@ -103,13 +103,13 @@ static inline cputime64_t
>> get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy(unsigned int cpu,
>> cputime64_t busy_time;
>>
>> cur_wall_time = jiffies64_to_cputime64(get_jiffies_64());
>> - busy_time = cputime64_add(kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[USER],
>> - kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[SYSTEM]);
>> + busy_time = cputime64_add(kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[USER],
>> + kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[SYSTEM]);
>>
>> - busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[IRQ]);
>> - busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[SOFTIRQ]);
>> - busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[STEAL]);
>> - busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[NICE]);
>> + busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[IRQ]);
>> + busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time,
>> kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[SOFTIRQ]);
>> + busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[STEAL]);
>> + busy_time = cputime64_add(busy_time, kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[NICE]);
>>
>
> This clobbers almost *all* the same lines as the last patch. There has
> to be a more readable way of structuring these 2 patches.
Yes, there is: Merging them in the same patch. But I preferred to keep
them logically separated. One of them brings index access, the other,
changes the macro name. I think this is more important than the eventual
clobber, but let me know your preference.
>> -struct kernel_stat {
>> +struct kernel_cpustat {
>> u64 cpustat[NR_STATS];
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct kernel_stat {
>> #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>> unsigned int irqs[NR_IRQS];
>> #endif
>> @@ -40,10 +43,13 @@ struct kernel_stat {
>> };
>>
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
>> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_cpustat, kernel_cpustat);
>>
>> /* Must have preemption disabled for this to be meaningful. */
>> #define kstat_this_cpu (&__get_cpu_var(kstat))
>> +#define kcpustat_this_cpu (&__get_cpu_var(kernel_cpustat))
>> #define kstat_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(kstat, cpu)
>> +#define kcpustat_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(kernel_cpustat, cpu)
>>
>> extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>> index 7ac5aa6..efdd4d8 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq,
>> s64 delta)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>> static int irqtime_account_hi_update(void)
>> {
>> - u64 *cpustat = kstat_this_cpu->cpustat;
>> + u64 *cpustat = kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u64 latest_ns;
>> int ret = 0;
>> @@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ static int irqtime_account_hi_update(void)
>>
>> static int irqtime_account_si_update(void)
>> {
>> - u64 *cpustat = kstat_this_cpu->cpustat;
>> + u64 *cpustat = kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u64 latest_ns;
>> int ret = 0;
>> @@ -3803,8 +3803,10 @@ unlock:
>> #endif
>>
>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_cpustat, kernel_cpustat);
>>
>> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(kstat);
>> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(kernel_cpustat);
>
> This would want a big fat comment explaining the difference.
>
Fair.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-15 15:59 [PATCH 0/4] Provide cpuacct functionality in cpu cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-11-15 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] Change cpustat fields to an array Glauber Costa
2011-11-16 5:58 ` Paul Turner
2011-11-16 11:25 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-16 11:31 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-15 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] split kernel stat in two Glauber Costa
2011-11-16 6:12 ` Paul Turner
2011-11-16 11:34 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-11-15 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] Keep scheduler statistics per cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-11-16 7:02 ` Paul Turner
2011-11-16 11:56 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-15 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] provide a version of cpuacct statistics inside cpu cgroup Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1321372757-1581-5-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-17 7:12 ` Balbir Singh
2011-11-17 7:12 ` Balbir Singh
2011-11-16 0:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] Provide cpuacct functionality in " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <20111116095706.6304e695.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-23 10:29 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-23 10:29 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC39FDD.10207@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.