From: Clarinet <clarinet@atlas.cz>
To: 647095@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:49:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC43DF7.4010902@atlas.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBD2825.6050806@atlas.cz>
Hi all,
>> Result of bisecting: v2.6.38-rc1 exhibits the problem. v2.6.37 and
>> many of the topic branches merged in the 2.6.38 merge window work ok.
>> Some other topic branches do not boot at all.
>>
>> Jiri: if you have gitk installed, then "git bisect visualize" can help
>> get a sense of what's in the middle of the regression range.
>> "gitk --bisect --first-parent v2.6.37..v2.6.38-rc1" might be a good way
>> to find mainline commits to test before finding a topic branch to delve
>> into.
>
> I have been able to narrow the interval manually a little bit from the
> "top" (the bad side) and I will go on from the bottom now. However,
> there seems to be a large area where kernels are unbootable for me -
> they mostly stop when init is called and I do not know why.
Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
solved I have been able to bisect without "skipping". The result is
surprising (at least for me) - believe it or not, the first bad commit
is 6610e089 "RTC: Rework RTC code to use timerqueue for events" from
John Stultz (I am sending him a copy of this message).
I would never expect this would be a problem, but my understanding of
this commit is very limited, so I am certainly missing the point.
However, I have tried to compile 2.6.38 (which was "bad") with "Real
Time Clock" configuration option turned off and it behaves "normally"
then (= is "good").
Can you please comment this result? What does it mean? Any idea what is
"wrong" there?
Best regards,
Jiri Polach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111030110543.5872.61279.reportbug@supermicro.uochb.cas.cz>
2011-10-30 15:25 ` CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle Ben Hutchings
2011-10-31 13:06 ` Clarinet
2011-11-08 12:33 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-10 1:52 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-11-11 13:50 ` Clarinet
2011-11-16 22:49 ` Clarinet [this message]
2011-11-17 20:32 ` John Stultz
2011-11-17 23:42 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-17 23:53 ` John Stultz
2011-11-21 13:27 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-21 20:02 ` John Stultz
2011-11-21 21:31 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-29 2:31 ` John Stultz
2011-11-29 12:26 ` Clarinet
2011-11-29 23:34 ` John Stultz
2011-12-02 10:44 ` Clarinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC43DF7.4010902@atlas.cz \
--to=clarinet@atlas.cz \
--cc=647095@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.