From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.13] helo=TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RRDpR-00015K-Ei for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:05:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4EC5BE16.9080205@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:08:22 +0800 From: LiuShuo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd/nand : set Nand flash page address to FBAR and FPAR correctly References: <1321349355-1639-1-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321349355-1639-2-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> In-Reply-To: <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tang Yuantian , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jerry Huang , scottwood@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, leoli@freescale.com, dwmw2@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ok and I want to add another patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:29 +0800, b35362@freescale.com wrote: >> From: Liu Shuo >> >> If we use the Nand flash chip whose number of pages in a block is greater >> than 64(for large page), we must treat the low bit of FBAR as being the >> high bit of the page address due to the limitation of FCM, it simply uses >> the low 6-bits (for large page) of the combined block/page address as the >> FPAR component, rather than considering the actual block size. > Looks like this patch depends on the previous white-space clean-up patch > - could you please refactor it (and 3/3 too) and resend? Ok and I am going to add another new patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > Artem. > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80984B7237 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:05:22 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4EC5BE16.9080205@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:08:22 +0800 From: LiuShuo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd/nand : set Nand flash page address to FBAR and FPAR correctly References: <1321349355-1639-1-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321349355-1639-2-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> In-Reply-To: <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tang Yuantian , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jerry Huang , scottwood@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ok and I want to add another patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:29 +0800, b35362@freescale.com wrote: >> From: Liu Shuo >> >> If we use the Nand flash chip whose number of pages in a block is greater >> than 64(for large page), we must treat the low bit of FBAR as being the >> high bit of the page address due to the limitation of FCM, it simply uses >> the low 6-bits (for large page) of the combined block/page address as the >> FPAR component, rather than considering the actual block size. > Looks like this patch depends on the previous white-space clean-up patch > - could you please refactor it (and 3/3 too) and resend? Ok and I am going to add another new patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > Artem. > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755933Ab1KRCFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:05:20 -0500 Received: from tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.13]:34216 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755565Ab1KRCFS (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:05:18 -0500 X-SpamScore: -12 X-BigFish: VS-12(zz936eK1432N98dKzz1202hzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h93fh61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI Message-ID: <4EC5BE16.9080205@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:08:22 +0800 From: LiuShuo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: , , , , , , , , Jerry Huang , Tang Yuantian Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd/nand : set Nand flash page address to FBAR and FPAR correctly References: <1321349355-1639-1-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321349355-1639-2-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> In-Reply-To: <1321568016.2272.29.camel@koala> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ok and I want to add another patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:29 +0800, b35362@freescale.com wrote: >> From: Liu Shuo >> >> If we use the Nand flash chip whose number of pages in a block is greater >> than 64(for large page), we must treat the low bit of FBAR as being the >> high bit of the page address due to the limitation of FCM, it simply uses >> the low 6-bits (for large page) of the combined block/page address as the >> FPAR component, rather than considering the actual block size. > Looks like this patch depends on the previous white-space clean-up patch > - could you please refactor it (and 3/3 too) and resend? Ok and I am going to add another new patch before 3/3. -LiuShuo > Artem. > >