From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (mail.geekisp.com [216.168.135.169]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734CBE0070C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 13797 invoked by uid 1003); 18 Nov 2011 16:00:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.111?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.172.5) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 18 Nov 2011 16:00:05 -0000 Message-ID: <4EC68104.30305@balister.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:00:04 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas References: <94FEB92A-6B46-4F5E-A331-B558F109B796@keylevel.com> <4EC6280B.1010308@communistcode.co.uk> <4D9E0AFD9C2FCC428A8EAADA898F5B2D0E8A96@TAMANS-MB100V.thcg.net> <4EC68022.7040407@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC68022.7040407@mlbassoc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto usability questions X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:00:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/18/2011 10:56 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2011-11-18 08:02, Ourada, Paul wrote: >> Jack said: >>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org >>> [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jack Mitchell >>> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 2:40 AM >>> To: yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto usability questions >>> >>> On 17/11/2011 21:38, Chris Tapp wrote: >>> On 16 Nov 2011, at 22:07, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: >>> >>> >>> Mark& everyone else listening: >>> >>> >>> It is very frustrating when you come to an issue that isn't >>> documented, however I have found the IRC an invaluable>resource as >>> well as this mailing list. If documentation was to become more >>> extensive I feel the categories should be>defined further and split >>> into more documents. >> >> I would just add that for some corporate/enterprise customers (such as >> myself), while IRC is great, it isn't as great an option because >> corporate IS locks down IRC protocols. To use IRC, I would have to do >> so from a non-work computer and likely outside of normal work hours, >> of which I already put in way more than my wife would prefer. :) > > IMO, IRC is like gossip - only those present learn anything :-( I think > information > should be shared and archived and IRC doesn't really cover that. That's > part of why > I pepper these lists with questions and problems and ... > Good irc channels are logged and the logs will be hit with google searches. Philip