From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: ASoC: cs4720: use snd_soc_cache_sync() Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:12:02 -0600 Message-ID: <4ECBC9D2.60800@freescale.com> References: <1321969516-21174-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <20111122140210.GD6624@sirena.org.uk> <4ECBBE59.2040703@gmail.com> <20111122153539.GF6624@sirena.org.uk> <4ECBC367.8080801@gmail.com> <4ECBC41D.4000904@freescale.com> <4ECBC66A.2060005@gmail Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from VA3EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (mail-va3.bigfish.com [216.32.180.10]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712E5103AC7 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:12:11 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <4ECBC66A.2060005@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Daniel Mack Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , Sven Neumann , lrg@ti.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Daniel Mack wrote: > Well, we're on a different platform and we don't use BLOCK_DATA > transfers but single byte instructions. You still think it's related? I have no idea, I just wanted to bring it to your attention, in case it sparked something. The original code uses i2c_smbus_write_byte_data, but the new code uses i2c_transfer(). Maybe that function is smarter about handling the I2C bus? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale