From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTKVE-00029w-D4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:37:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 13839 invoked by uid 1003); 23 Nov 2011 21:30:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.104?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.172.5) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Nov 2011 21:30:39 -0000 Message-ID: <4ECD65FC.7000104@balister.org> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:30:36 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:37:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/23/2011 04:18 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/11/23 Khem Raj > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Mats Kärrman >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Are there any plans for new releases and/or maintenance branches of OE >> classic? >>> >> >> 2011.03-maintenance is the last release of OE classic. As long as the >> branch is maintained >> >> _ >> >> Related: I noticed TSC plans to discuss on whether or not to make oe > classic read only. > > I'd like to suggest leaving it open for those of us that are still using > it. > For instance I have still products that are based on OE classic. If there > is a problem that is of a generic nature, I'm more than happy to submit > patches so others in the same situation can benefit from it. > (actually I have one pending with a new version of netsnmp; the current > recipe does not build with uclibc, whereas the latest version of netsnmp > does; found/fixed this today, but haven't had time to make a commit) > > And if there is no interest any more it'll eventually die. But as of now I > do see people working on/with it (see the commit log). At some point it needs to die/go read only. But, until oe-core + openembedded can replace it, we need to be able to do minor updates to support already deployed systems. Philip