All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:01:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECDF2D0.2050505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124141046.fdb4b9b923d850b0686924c3@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thursday 24 November 2011 08:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the regulator tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c: In function 'gpio_regulator_probe':
> drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c:287:8: error: too few arguments to function 'regulator_register'
> include/linux/regulator/driver.h:215:23: note: declared here

Thanks Stephen, I just posted a patch to fix this on the regulator
for-next.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/24/29

>
>
> Caused by commit 2c043bcbf287 ("regulator: pass additional of_node to
> regulator_register()").
>
> drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c was added in commit 3f0292ae8bb1
> ("regulator: Add driver for gpio-controlled regulators") which was
> included in Linus' tree before v3.2-rc1.
>
> I have used the regulator tree from next-20111123 for today.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-24  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-24  3:10 linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24  7:31 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-10  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-20  4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-20  4:55 ` Axel Lin
2012-06-20 15:33   ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-21  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21  8:13 ` Kim, Milo
2012-06-21  8:20   ` Axel Lin
2012-06-21  8:42     ` Kim, Milo
2012-06-21  9:14     ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 11:04     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21 11:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21 11:30       ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 17:35       ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-21 17:35         ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-21  9:46   ` Mark Brown
2012-09-10  3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-01  4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-01  6:07 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  6:07   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  8:43   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-01  8:47     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  8:47       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-07-01  8:42 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-06  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27  4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-08  3:10 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-17 20:41 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08  8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-09 22:39 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-10  2:33   ` Chris Zhong
2014-09-10 10:54     ` Mark Brown
2014-09-10  2:50   ` Doug Anderson
2015-03-10  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-10 10:40 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-09  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-09  9:35 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-13 23:44   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-14  1:07     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-04-14  1:22       ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-14  9:40         ` Mark Brown
2015-04-15  3:03           ` Dave Airlie
2015-04-09 15:00 ` Rob Clark
2017-02-01  2:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-01 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2017-02-02 22:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-03 11:31     ` Mark Brown
2018-11-20  0:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20  0:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-08-29  3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03  6:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-02-25 23:39 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22  1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22 10:31 ` Alistair
2021-10-22 12:40   ` Mark Brown
2021-11-23  7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-23  8:33 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-23  9:26 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-23 14:17   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-07  3:01 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECDF2D0.2050505@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.