From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mchehab@redhat.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:05:24 -0200 Subject: [PATCH RESEND] davinci: dm646x: move vpif related code to driver core header from platform In-Reply-To: <1321110362-6699-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> References: <1321110362-6699-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> Message-ID: <4ECE8764.60800@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Em 12-11-2011 13:06, Manjunath Hadli escreveu: > move vpif related code for capture and display drivers > from dm646x platform header file to vpif_types.h as these definitions > are related to driver code more than the platform or board. > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli Manju, Why are you re-sending a patch? My understanding is that you're maintaining the davinci patches, so it is up to you to put those patches on your tree and send me a pull request when they're done. So, please, don't pollute the ML re-sending emails that are for yourself to handle. Regards, Mauro. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17592 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789Ab1KXSFf (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:05:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4ECE8764.60800@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:05:24 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manjunath Hadli CC: LMML , dlos , LAK Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] davinci: dm646x: move vpif related code to driver core header from platform References: <1321110362-6699-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <1321110362-6699-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 12-11-2011 13:06, Manjunath Hadli escreveu: > move vpif related code for capture and display drivers > from dm646x platform header file to vpif_types.h as these definitions > are related to driver code more than the platform or board. > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli Manju, Why are you re-sending a patch? My understanding is that you're maintaining the davinci patches, so it is up to you to put those patches on your tree and send me a pull request when they're done. So, please, don't pollute the ML re-sending emails that are for yourself to handle. Regards, Mauro.