From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTvht-00073c-Sl for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:20:45 +0100 Received: by wwo1 with SMTP id 1so4941586wwo.24 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.205.135 with SMTP id fq7mr21492392wbb.19.1322226851454; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from fensuse.internal.dresearch-fe.de (pd95cb174.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.92.177.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z35sm788712wbm.12.2011.11.25.05.14.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:14:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4ECF94A1.9050803@dresearch-fe.de> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:14:09 +0100 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <201111092321.33622.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <2977361.KIYvSC26hZ@helios> <1627207.pd1HnObREr@helios> In-Reply-To: <1627207.pd1HnObREr@helios> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: systemd packages -> image X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:20:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10.11.2011 11:35, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 11:20:34 Koen Kooi wrote: >> So I can start sending patches to add the systemd files to ${PN} in oe-core >> recipes now? > > I would think if these additions are conditional upon systemd being in > DISTRO_FEATURES, I can't see a problem. I think the ideal situation would be > to have a generic "init" bbclass (or some better name) which does all the work > for you regardless of whether sysvinit or systemd is used (i.e. it would > effectively replace update-rc.d.bbclass), and save having to have packaging > boilerplate in every recipe. What about upstart in this context? An generic "init" bbclass should support this too. > My main point was, yes there are both people who want to stay with sysvinit > and people who are keen to move to systemd, but I'm not convinced both of > those need to be catered for within the same distro policy. > >> That's the big hold up: lack of vision from the OE-core folks. > > This is a community project, if you have ideas or suggestions, just start the > discussion... -- DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@dresearch-fe.de Fax: +49 30 515932-299 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle; Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B; Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058