From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RU3m7-0000kl-GI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:57:39 +0100 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so3272577wwf.0 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:51:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K/Mj8rKEmvVoiFIUBGJELErJycSzlaXZrZdIrQ7nSg0=; b=LBikI70qJpOkjcJvjtLhKAT186jifLvyVB5JaHYf9FN4ByseSu4MoH5VR/UpS4RoeG +U73T7l2wQjp/NSGvAgYbnxmrE4T+PXpULcttmCXXYxGtgfPI0EzpQnadQW1+qyUapOw qYbkOKS1e3SvKovInTM9g+bNPzp569vqP5ggc= Received: by 10.227.207.201 with SMTP id fz9mr22878231wbb.25.1322257864854; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.68.68.173] (cpc2-gill1-0-0-cust1894.basl.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.34.63.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a27sm29039966wbp.16.2011.11.25.13.51.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:51:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4ED00DC1.3080605@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:50:57 +0000 From: Mr Dash Four User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4EC81A85.8050704@googlemail.com> <4ECE4B0D.6030401@googlemail.com> <4ECE5422.3070504@googlemail.com> <20111124174936.GA28767@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4ECE87A9.8040109@googlemail.com> <20111124182713.GH28767@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4ECEE6D8.7080802@googlemail.com> <20111125050922.GA30623@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4ECF2887.2040400@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: "cannot find -lppl_c" link error X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:57:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> I have just finished my built - the whole lot and with a lot of warnings, mainly from unpackaged files - don't know whether these are important though. >> > > they should be looked into sometimes there might be important files that > go unpackaged > I kept a log of these and can attach them separately. From what I remember the majority of them all were from the gcc packaging. >> I'll probably spend the weekend fine-tuning this as my build went over 25G in size - massive! Thanks for your help Raj, much appreciated! >> > > yes its big since a lot of software is built you could use rm_work > feature where it will try to delete the work dirs after they are > successfully built but I would suggest not to do that unless you > really need it. > I really have to - I've expanded my "dev" partition to the limit now and I run a lot of other things - I didn't expect this to take so much space - I am executing a massive 15k+ steps task with bitbake at present and I am dreading the free disk space - I have "barely" 50G left. OE is actually a very handy tool to have - I have been struggling with different projects mainly because of the nightmares of building and maintaining the toolchains needed for the various arches I have been using. This seems to be very streamlined in OE, so I might start developing some recipes soon.