From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/62] infiniband: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic() Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:45:17 +0800 Message-ID: <4ED33C0D.3020001@redhat.com> References: <1322371662-26166-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1322371662-26166-17-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Roland Dreier Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8828=E6=97=A5 15:38, Roland Dreier =E5=86= =99=E9=81=93: > These look fine, given the second argument is unused. So > > Acked-by: Roland Dreier > Thanks, Roland! > ... or is there some point when the part is > going in and where it makes sense for me to apply this through > my tree? > I think this patchset should be taken as a whole, so either Andrew takes them all, or let Stephen to merge my tree[1] to linux-next. But I don't know if Andrew has different opinions. 1. git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #for-next -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752216Ab1K1Hpg (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:45:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19971 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751034Ab1K1Hpe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:45:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4ED33C0D.3020001@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:45:17 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Dreier CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/62] infiniband: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic() References: <1322371662-26166-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1322371662-26166-17-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 于 2011年11月28日 15:38, Roland Dreier 写道: > These look fine, given the second argument is unused. So > > Acked-by: Roland Dreier > Thanks, Roland! > ... or is there some point when the part is > going in and where it makes sense for me to apply this through > my tree? > I think this patchset should be taken as a whole, so either Andrew takes them all, or let Stephen to merge my tree[1] to linux-next. But I don't know if Andrew has different opinions. 1. git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #for-next