From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:45:49 +0400
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH] davinci: disable dcache on boards with EMAC
In-Reply-To: <4ED38512.3030202@aribaud.net>
References: <1321048618-20616-1-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com>
	<20111127150922.091F91FFB3AB@gemini.denx.de>
	<CA+M6bXkFRqkzRtiPuLYN9Zi8ZtXCYQS+LAT4pbKD0nmb3NONdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111127180945.E0BBB1FFB3AC@gemini.denx.de>
	<4ED2835F.4010802@emcraft.com>
	<20111127184924.BD0131FFB3AB@gemini.denx.de>
	<4ED28DFD.7090805@emcraft.com>
	<20111127193612.65CA21FFB3AD@gemini.denx.de>
	<4ED38512.3030202@aribaud.net>
Message-ID: <4ED3BABD.60506@emcraft.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On 28.11.2011 16:56, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Yes, that would be the 4th approach, listed as "much better" :-)
> 
> Better yet, have an ARM-wide, not only ARM926EJ-S, cache framework with
> a hierarchy of cache function implementations, from ARM architectures to
> Cores / SoCs or even boards.

Surely, that will be much-much better. Actually I think there is some
room for even more unification:
 - alignment checks are need for (almost?) any arch
 - many ARM families share the same (or very similar) CP15 register set
 - ???

Unfortunately, I don't have enough time right now to dig into this.

Regards, Ilya.