From: "Wouter M. Koolen" <W.M.Koolen-Wijkstra@cwi.nl>
To: "Wouter M. Koolen" <W.M.Koolen-Wijkstra@cwi.nl>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, keithp@keithp.com
Subject: Re: kmemleak: unreferenced object in copy_thread
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:06:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED68CCE.1070400@cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED68BBF.8010608@cwi.nl>
Add i915 maintainer Keith Packard to CC.
On 11/30/2011 08:02 PM, Wouter M. Koolen wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2011 11:54 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> I can't yet tell whether it's a false positive or not. Did the X
>> server die? Is the process with pid 1415 still around? The leaked
>> object looks like the thread stack (8K) and it should have been
>> removed when the corresponding process was killed.
> Hi Catalin,
>
> Just got lucky and hit it again. This time it occurred without
> killing. Here's the splat:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff880003eda000 (size 8192):
> comm "Xorg", pid 1117, jiffies 4295143832 (age 34745.832s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff813feeb1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50
> [<ffffffff8111086b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xdb/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff81001fbe>] copy_thread+0x1be/0x260
> [<ffffffff81044953>] copy_process+0xee3/0x1520
> [<ffffffff810450d6>] do_fork+0x116/0x350
> [<ffffffff8100a7d3>] sys_clone+0x23/0x30
> [<ffffffff8141c173>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> The process 1117 is still alive. It is
>
> root 1117 2.1 1.3 147484 28152 tty7 Ss+ 09:55 13:02
> /usr/bin/X :0 vt7 -br -nolisten tcp -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-Tdu4bb
>
>
> Actually, there now are several splats of a second kind, relating to
> i915 gem buffers (attached). This type of splat has been reported
> before in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/4/15
> although that thread seems to be a dead end. Maybe these warnings have
> a common source?
>
> What would be a good next step?
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Wouter Koolen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 18:09 kmemleak: unreferenced object in copy_thread Wouter M. Koolen
2011-11-30 11:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-30 14:02 ` Wouter M. Koolen
2011-11-30 20:02 ` Wouter M. Koolen
2011-11-30 20:06 ` Wouter M. Koolen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED68CCE.1070400@cwi.nl \
--to=w.m.koolen-wijkstra@cwi.nl \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.