From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:32:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] imx: add polled io uart methods In-Reply-To: <20111019035249.GA20598@lithium.compnerd.org> References: <1318821721-11965-1-git-send-email-compnerd@compnerd.org> <1318821721-11965-2-git-send-email-compnerd@compnerd.org> <20111018072733.GC21504@pengutronix.de> <20111019035249.GA20598@lithium.compnerd.org> Message-ID: <4ED757CB.8030000@de.bosch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19.10.2011 05:52, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:22:01PM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: >>> These methods are invoked if the iMX uart is used in conjuction with kgdb during >>> early boot. In order to access the UART without the interrupts, the kernel uses >>> the basic polling methods for IO with the device. With these methods >>> implemented, it is now possible to enable kgdb during early boot over serial. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Saleem Abdulrasool >>> --- >>> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c >>> index 7e91b3d..4fcf9ca 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c >>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ >>> #define UCR2_STPB (1<<6) /* Stop */ >>> #define UCR2_WS (1<<5) /* Word size */ >>> #define UCR2_RTSEN (1<<4) /* Request to send interrupt enable */ >>> +#define UCR2_ATEN (1<<3) /* Aging Timer Enable */ >>> #define UCR2_TXEN (1<<2) /* Transmitter enabled */ >>> #define UCR2_RXEN (1<<1) /* Receiver enabled */ >>> #define UCR2_SRST (1<<0) /* SW reset */ >>> @@ -1075,6 +1076,77 @@ imx_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_struct *ser) >>> return ret; >>> } >>> >>> + >> needless newline > > Removed. > >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL) >>> +static int imx_poll_get_char(struct uart_port *port) >>> +{ >>> + volatile unsigned int status; >> Why is that volatile? > > It shouldnt be, removed the volatile attribute. Im not sure why that was there, > it really doesnt make any sense since there isnt any inline assembler there to > confuse the compiler. > >>> + unsigned int cr1, cr2, cr3; >>> + unsigned char c; >>> + >>> + /* save control registers */ >>> + cr1 = readl(port->membase + UCR1); >>> + cr2 = readl(port->membase + UCR2); >>> + cr3 = readl(port->membase + UCR3); >>> + >> Best regards >> Uwe > > Thanks for the review. Ive not attached the updated patch since Id like to make > the changes that Sascha suggested, and I shall post the updated patch > subsequently. Any update on this? Many thanks Dirk