From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] KEXEC: allocate crash note buffers at boot
	time v3
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:00:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4ED78886.6070101@citrix.com>
References: <CAFCBF30.262CB%keir.xen@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFCBF30.262CB%keir.xen@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/12/11 05:20, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 12:56, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
>>> +    register_keyhandler('C', &crashdump_trigger_keyhandler);
>>> +
>>> +    /* If no crash area, no need to allocate space for notes. */
>>> +    if ( 0 == kexec_crash_area.size )
>>> +        return 0;
>> Wouldn't it make sense to switch the order of these?
> I also really hate this constant-first ordering.
>
>  -- Keir
>

It was a useful habit I got into when learning C/C++ and has stayed with
me.  I will endeavor to not do it.

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com